FTAA Impact
What? No Oil?
Why Bankruptcies?
Accountability in NZ
Focus on Congress
Banking Fraud
Greenspan on Gold
Treaty Supremacy
Judicial Tyranny
Reconstruct Republic
Restore Dollar
Decl of Independence
Price Paid
Constitutional Power
U S Constitution

To Restore Government Accountability
First Recognize its Loss




Highlighting Hot Issues
to Recognize the Loss of Accountability
in All Three Branches of Our Government






What now? Was the bailout constitutional? http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd400.htm"

Re: the Current (Sept. 2008) Financial Crisis
How the Cure Could be Worse Than the Disease

A Crisis of Opportunity


130 economists, from universities all over the nation, signed a letter to Congress warning that the bailout will be worse than the disease.
http://faculty.chicagogsb.edu/john.cochrane/research/Papers/mortgage_protest.htm

To understand more fully the lack of accountability in this crisis, you might want to read THE FAKE $700 BILLION BAILOUT RESCUE PLAN
http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd399.htm

Hear also from Thomas Jefferson ...
The earth belongs to the living, not the dead. The will and the power of men expire with their lives, by nature's law ... Each generation has the usufruct of the earth during the period of its continuance ... We may consider each generation as a distinct nation, with a right, by the will of the majority, to bind themselves, but none to bind the succeeding generation ...
-- Thomas Jefferson, in a Letter to Eppes, June 24, 1813 Dr. Martin A. Larson, The IRS vs. the Middle Class, p.182
and …
I sincerely believe, with you that banking institutions are more dangerous than standing armies and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale.
— Letter to John Taylor, May 28, 1816, id p. 227

If the USA survives this "rescue" from the current financial crisis, no one in his right mind will ever vote again for anyone who voted to loot the American people to subsidize the fattest cats on Wall Street and in D.C. Those fat cats engineered this crisis, and, if it were possible, should be prosecuted and forced to make restitution to those who have lost their homes.

Those fat cats know that the USA has no money. They have it all, as they have been stealing from the American people for 95 years. The USA is already trillions of dollars in debt. The only way we can fork up several trillions more is to borrow it. All the countries in the world will be glad to lend us money, of course, because of what we have as collateral: our infrustructure. So there could come a day that all our bridges, dams, highways, trains, national parks, water works, etc., … even our homes? will belong to foreigners; and for the use of which we will have to pay tolls. Already a turnpike in Indiana belongs to China. Or we can suffer hyperinflation as the Fed cranks up the printing presses to lend it to us. It costs them less than 1’ per paper note, and we then owe them the face value plus interest; while the actual value will have plummeted to a fraction of its present value, which is already only a tiny fraction of its value in the 1930s, when a 1st class stamp was 3’, and mail delivery was twice daily.

In 1921, in a similar crisis, the market was allowed to correct itself. It did it in less than a year. Perhaps the hurts could be healed by some class action law suits — by the victims (those who have lost their homes) against the perpetrators of the fraud (the lenders who purposefully and knowingly got people into debt over their heads.)

Is this the time — right now, while the People are aware they have been had — to pull the rabbit out of the hat and get rid of the Federal Reserve? Congress never had authority to delegate to others its constitutional authority and responsibility in the first place. So the Federal Reserve is unconstitutional on its face. Whoever would lead a movement in Congress to get rid of the engineer of these crimes as well as the thief of our wealth since 1913, and take its authority and responsibility back, would go down in history as a hero!

Let us hear from Andrew Jackson, who refused to renew the Second Bank of the United States …
You are a den of vipers. I intend to rout you out and by the Eternal God I will rout you out. If the people only understood the rank injustice of our money and banking system, there would be a revolution before morning.
— from the Secrets of the Federal Reserve, by Eustace Mullins
And this from James Dale Davidson and Lord William Rees-Mogg in the international best seller, The Great Reckoning:
Debt cannot go on compounding faster than output forever. At the rate it expanded in the United States in the 1980s, interest payments would consume 100 percent of GNP by the year 2015. No such thing will happen. Long before debt reaches that extreme, it will be wiped away. Either an economic deflation will cause the financial system to implode, or a political inflation of an extreme kind will obliterate much of the value of debts denominated in dollars.

And this from Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr. …
… the present system of money and banking cannot eradicate, or even lessen, but only exacerbate America's financial difficulties, because the present regime is the problem, everything else being merely a symptom.
— Why Does the United States Need Constitutional Money? Six Questions on Monetary Reform., Monograph No. 5

Following are two messages from Dr. Ron Paul (the Dr. NO in the House of Representatives, who has never voted for anything unconstitutional).
Wednesday, September 24, 2008

Dear Friends,

Whenever a Great Bipartisan Consensus is announced, and a compliant media assures everyone that the wondrous actions of our wise leaders are being taken for our own good, you can know with absolute certainty that disaster is about to strike.

The events of the past week are no exception.

The bailout package that is about to be rammed down Congress' throat is not just economically foolish. It is downright sinister. It makes a mockery of our Constitution, which our leaders should never again bother pretending is still in effect. It promises the American people a never-ending nightmare of ever-greater debt liabilities they will have to shoulder. Two weeks ago, financial analyst Jim Rogers said the bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac made America more communist than China! "This is welfare for the rich," he said. "This is socialism for the rich. It's bailing out the financiers, the banks, the Wall Streeters."

That describes the current bailout package to a T. And we're being told it's unavoidable.

The claim that the market caused all this is so staggeringly foolish that only politicians and the media could pretend to believe it. But that has become the conventional wisdom, with the desired result that those responsible for the credit bubble and its predictable consequences - predictable, that is, to those who understand sound, Austrian economics - are being let off the hook. The Federal Reserve System is actually positioning itself as the savior, rather than the culprit, in this mess!
 The Treasury Secretary is authorized to purchase up to $700 billion in mortgage-related assets at any one time. That means $700 billion is only the very beginning of what will hit us.

 Financial institutions are "designated as financial agents of the Government." This is the New Deal to end all New Deals.

 Then there's this: "Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency." Translation: the Secretary can buy up whatever junk debt he wants to, burden the American people with it, and be subject to no one in the process.
There goes your country.

Even some so-called free-market economists are calling all this "sadly necessary." Sad, yes. Necessary? Don't make me laugh.

Our one-party system is complicit in yet another crime against the American people. The two major party candidates for president themselves initially indicated their strong support for bailouts of this kind — another example of the big choice we're supposedly presented with this November: yes or yes. Now, with a backlash brewing, they're not quite sure what their views are. A sad display, really.

Although the present bailout package is almost certainly not the end of the political atrocities we'll witness in connection with the crisis, time is short. Congress may vote as soon as tomorrow. With a Rasmussen poll finding support for the bailout at an anemic seven percent, some members of Congress are afraid to vote for it. Call them! Let them hear from you! Tell them you will never vote for anyone who supports this atrocity.

The issue boils down to this: do we care about freedom? Do we care about responsibility and accountability? Do we care that our government and media have been bought and paid for? Do we care that average Americans are about to be looted in order to subsidize the fattest of cats on Wall Street and in government? Do we care?

When the chips are down, will we stand up and fight, even if it means standing up against every stripe of fashionable opinion in politics and the media?

Times like these have a way of telling us what kind of a people we are, and what kind of country we shall be.

In liberty,
Ron Paul

Paul Streitz Director, CT Citizens for Immigration Control
http://www.ctimmigration.com/
amfirst@optonline.net



From: Congresman Ron Paul [mailto:updates08@ronpaulforcongress.com]
Sent: Thu 9/25/2008 2:52 PM
Dear Friends:

The financial meltdown the economists of the Austrian School predicted has arrived.

We are in this crisis because of an excess of artificially created credit at the hands of the Federal Reserve System. The solution being proposed? More artificial credit by the Federal Reserve. No liquidation of bad debt and malinvestment is to be allowed. By doing more of the same, we will only continue and intensify the distortions in our economy — all the capital misallocation, all the malinvestment — and prevent the market's attempt to re-establish rational pricing of houses and other assets.

Last night the president addressed the nation about the financial crisis. There is no point in going through his remarks line by line, since I'd only be repeating what I've been saying over and over — not just for the past several days, but for years and even decades.

Still, at least a few observations are necessary.

The president assures us that his administration "is working with Congress to address the root cause behind much of the instability in our markets." Care to take a guess at whether the Federal Reserve and its money creation spree were even mentioned?

We are told that "low interest rates" led to excessive borrowing, but we are not told how these low interest rates came about. They were a deliberate policy of the Federal Reserve. As always, artificially low interest rates distort the market. Entrepreneurs engage in malinvestments — investments that do not make sense in light of current resource availability, that occur in more temporally remote stages of the capital structure than the pattern of consumer demand can support, and that would not have been made at all if the interest rate had been permitted to tell the truth instead of being toyed with by the Fed.

Not a word about any of that, of course, because Americans might then discover how the great wise men in Washington caused this great debacle. Better to keep scapegoating the mortgage industry or "wildcat capitalism" (as if we actually have a pure free market!).

Speaking about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the president said: "Because these companies were chartered by Congress, many believed they were guaranteed by the federal government. This allowed them to borrow enormous sums of money, fuel the market for questionable investments, and put our financial system at risk."

Doesn't that prove the foolishness of chartering Fannie and Freddie in the first place? Doesn't that suggest that maybe, just maybe, government may have contributed to this mess? And of course, by bailing out Fannie and Freddie, hasn't the federal government shown that the "many" who "believed they were guaranteed by the federal government" were in fact correct?

Then come the scare tactics. If we don't give dictatorial powers to the Treasury Secretary "the stock market would drop even more, which would reduce the value of your retirement account. The value of your home could plummet." Left unsaid, naturally, is that with the bailout and all the money and credit that must be produced out of thin air to fund it, the value of your retirement account will drop anyway, because the value of the dollar will suffer a precipitous decline. As for home prices, they are obviously much too high, and supply and demand cannot equilibrate if government insists on propping them up.

It's the same destructive strategy that government tried during the Great Depression: prop up prices at all costs. The Depression went on for over a decade. On the other hand, when liquidation was allowed to occur in the equally devastating downturn of 1921, the economy recovered within less than a year.

The president also tells us that Senators McCain and Obama will join him at the White House today in order to figure out how to get the bipartisan bailout passed. The two senators would do their country much more good if they stayed on the campaign trail debating who the bigger celebrity is, or whatever it is that occupies their attention these days.

F.A. Hayek won the Nobel Prize for showing how central banks' manipulation of interest rates creates the boom-bust cycle with which we are sadly familiar. In 1932, in the depths of the Great Depression, he described the foolish policies being pursued in his day — and which are being proposed, just as destructively, in our own:

Instead of furthering the inevitable liquidation of the maladjustments brought about by the boom during the last three years, all conceivable means have been used to prevent that readjustment from taking place; and one of these means, which has been repeatedly tried though without success, from the earliest to the most recent stages of depression, has been this deliberate policy of credit expansion.

To combat the depression by a forced credit expansion is to attempt to cure the evil by the very means which brought it about; because we are suffering from a misdirection of production, we want to create further misdirection — a procedure that can only lead to a much more severe crisis as soon as the credit expansion comes to an end ... It is probably to this experiment, together with the attempts to prevent liquidation once the crisis had come, that we owe the exceptional severity and duration of the depression.

The only thing we learn from history, I am afraid, is that we do not learn from history.

The very people who have spent the past several years assuring us that the economy is fundamentally sound, and who themselves foolishly cheered the extension of all these novel kinds of mortgages, are the ones who now claim to be the experts who will restore prosperity! Just how spectacularly wrong, how utterly without a clue, does someone have to be before his expert status is called into question?

Oh, and did you notice that the bailout is now being called a "rescue plan"? I guess "bailout" wasn't sitting too well with the American people.

The very people who with somber faces tell us of their deep concern for the spread of democracy around the world are the ones most insistent on forcing a bill through Congress that the American people overwhelmingly oppose. The very fact that some of you seem to think you're supposed to have a voice in all this actually seems to annoy them.

I continue to urge you to contact your representatives and give them a piece of your mind. I myself am doing everything I can to promote the correct point of view on the crisis. Be sure also to educate yourselves on these subjects — the Campaign for Liberty blog is an excellent place to start. Read the posts, ask questions in the comment section, and learn.

H.G. Wells once said that civilization was in a race between education and catastrophe. Let us learn the truth and spread it as far and wide as our circumstances allow. For the truth is the greatest weapon we have.

In liberty,
Ron Paul

Paul Streitz
Director, CT Citizens for Immigration Control
http://www.ctimmigration.com/
amfirst@optonline.net

Let's keep those phones ringing!

or here is a sample fax or email ...

The good news is that this is a crisis of opportunity!

I urge you to have a visit with Dr. Ron Paul, Rep. from Texas. He knows that the basic problem is the Federal Reserve. It is unconstitutional, because the Congress was given no authority in the Constitution to give away its authority and responsibilities. Money and commerce are responsibilities of Congress. The Federal Reserve has been debauching our currency and stealing our wealth for more than half a century. The following was written by the father of our debt money system, John Maynard Keynes ...
"By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose." — The Economic Consequences of the Peace, 1920

This is a crisis of opportunity.... opportunity for Congress to get rid of the Federal Reserve, and take back its constitutional authority and responsibility ... NOW, while the People are incensed and aware that they are being taken to the cleaners.

I urge you to sign on to Ron Paul's bill for that purpose. Join him in this movement. You will both go down in history as heros.

Thank you for your consideration.







What about the Constitution?
What does it have to do with government accountability?


Isn't it an outdated harness on the people, and best forgotten?

Absolutely NOT!
Though it is not a perfect document, as Jefferson so eloquently attested, giving us warning of the ills that have ensued (especially regarding the judiciary), and though the schools and the media have carefully taught for the better part of a century that the Constitution is an outdated harness on the people and best forgotten, the Constitution was designed for your protection.

They may have their own agenda, those scoffers who claim it is outdated.

Very little of the Constitution is devoted to the granting of power.
All the rest of the Constitution is devoted to constraining that power --
to protect the rights of the sovereign citizen. The Ninth and Tenth Amendments were added to the Constitution to set the standard.
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
__ The Ninth Amendment

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the People.
— The Tenth Amendment
The federal government has NO authority that is not expressly given to it in the Constitution. NONE! ZILCH! How hard is that to understand?




NOTE: All of the links in the article below (there are not many) are essential background information to be able fully to comprehend why the USA MUST restore its government to accountability, and the seriousness of our situation.

Before you leave this page, if you have not followed those links as you go, please do yourself the favor of coming back and following each and every one of them, even if you think you know all about that subject. You may be surprised by how much you do not know.

What you also need to know is that all is not necessarily lost. There is a way to turn all around. Our part is to give you the facts, of many of which most are unaware. What you do with the information is up to you.





"… a long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right, and raises at first a formidable outcry in defense of custom." – Thomas Paine in his preface to "Common Sense"




The USA Was the World’s Greatest Nation!
What Is Happening to the USA?


Homes are foreclosed.

Manufacturers close plants, terminate their workforce, and outsource production to other countries. People lose jobs by the hundreds of thousands.

The USA is the biggest debtor in the world, yet Congress squanders $$$ billions on pork (earmarks). The loss in value of our “dollar” will no doubt be used to persuade the USA to want the “stronger amero.”

Via the Free Trade Area of the Americas, FTAA, the USA is about to be merged into a North American Union, (NAU) with two other nations, of which …

… One has a totally corrupt government that, in spite of abundant natural resources, and the industriousness of its people, has always rigorously kept them in poverty, and brazenly exploited the compassion of the USA.

… The other owes allegiance to the British crown.

The trade route through the three nations merged into the NAU will come from Mexican ports, the cargo having bypassed all US West Coast ports, and will cross US borders as if they were not there.

With abuse of eminent domain, The NAU superhighway will demolish cities and towns, destroy farms, and split ranches, and will be built and managed by foreign corporations, which will collect the tolls for 50 years.

The corporation which will manage the NAU superhighway has ties to the Chinese government. The inland port of only inspection for the NAU superhighway (electronic only) will be Mexican territory … in Kansas City!

This is not a plan for the distant future.
Work has already begun!





Why has all this happened?
Can the USA survive?


All this would never have happened if the People had demanded that the public officials be accountable, holding them to the standard of the Constitution.

Why did they not demand such accountability?

They could not demand it, because they did not know the Constitution.
They did not know they were being deceived.

How many people today know the Constitution? How many know they have been, and are being, deceived? Have the schools of the USA become tools of the elite to deceive the People?




Were you aware of this? …

Up until 1942 the USA had virtually no INCOME TAX
The government was funded by TARIFFS!



Now consider this …

Trade treaties have removed the TARIFFS.
Today the USA has a punitive INCOME TAX.





What do the income tax and tariffs have to do with government accountability?





Let us look at a small bit of history — in a nutshell —
from the perspective of the Constitution;
history that I did not learn in school; did you? …

Three Events in 1913 rendered us unable
to hold our public officials accountable.


Isn't that what one calls a Coup d'Etat? Yet the people, already in 1913, did not know the Constitution, and they slept through it, while no one brought it to their attention.

All three events were unconstitutional, in content and/or in application. Each had at least two purposes — at least one of which was deceitfully hidden …



1 .... The 16th Amendment to the Constitution —
ushered in the income tax,

was fraudulently declared ratified,
and violates Art. 1 § 8, of the Constitution

.... *.... Penalizes labor & industry, as well as you and me, and instituted …

.... *.... A tool to control the People
— essentially kept hidden until 1942

With tax deductions, tax credits, and 501c3 privilege, used as carrots, the income tax is used to control pulpits, as well as industry and individuals in their investments. How many of your financial decisions are governed by consideration of tax consequences, rather than by sound financial planning? How many preachers sanitize their sermons in order not to lose the 501c3 privilege?
"From many generations’ ranks
Someone steps forward, all alone.
Genius announces privilege
And going, leaves oppression’s yoke."
— from a poem of Boris Pasternak:


2 .... The Seventeenth Amendment to the Constitution —
disenfranched the States


It was fraudulently declared ratified, and violates the intent of Art. V of the Constitution, which provides that "no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate."

Since the Senate was intended to represent the States, while the House of Representatives was intended to represent the People, the Framers never dreamed that an amendment would ever be ut forth totally to deprive the States of ANY suffrage in the Senate, or they would have worded Art. V more clearly. Still, their intent is obvious.

.... *.... Disenfranchised the States and …

.... *.... Made Senators unaccountable to everyone, except ...,
to those who fund their campaigns. (To campaign across a whole State is infinitely more expensive than to campaign only in the State legislature). Senators are now accountable mostly to the credit industry.

The 16th & 17th Amendments also paved the way or the passage of the greatest fraud in history …



3 .... The Federal Reserve Act —
gave Congressional authority to a private bank
violates Art. 1 §s 8,10 of the Constitution

AMIDST BUSY PREPARATIONS for departure for Christmas recess, legislation was railroaded through both houses of Congress on December 22, 1913. It was signed into "law" by President Wilson on December 23. Some of its opponents had already departed, and those hesitant who were present were assured their doubts were unfounded. That is how the third event, the passing of the Federal Reserve Act, came about. It would be the main link in the chain -- for which the first two were necessary prerequisites.

Some of its proponents did not necessarily have evil intent. Many of them sincerely thought it would solve serious problems -- now known to have been artificially created. Some of the most prominent of their number are known to have later bitterly regretted their action. These included Woodrow Wilson, the President who had signed it into being; William Jennings Bryan, the Democrat Party Whip, without whom it would probably never have passed the House; and its sponsor in the Senate, the Senator from the new state of Oklahoma, Robert Owen, who spent the rest of his life trying to get the Act repealed.

.... *.... Instituted a hidden tax
to confiscate much of the wealth of the People

.... *.... Made all public officials to be accountable to no one, except
... to the “money interests,” who use the money of the People to buy the officials' favors.

This was a coup by the "money interests" who have been using our money to exercise power to pull the strings of our government officials ever since.

Some Knew What They Were Doing.

The following was written by the father of our debt money system,
John Maynard Keynes …
"By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose."
— The Economic Consequences of the Peace, 1920



Then trade treaties removed tariffs,

the only tax that protects labor, industry,
and the national economy.

Manufacturers, paying a decent wage, penalized by income tax, and with no tariffs to protect them from the competition of slave labor, cannot compete with imports from China and elsewhere, with their exports subsidized by their own governments.

Manufacturers now have two options for survival:

.... *.... They can fire their legal work force and replace them with illegal aliens, who can work for a pittance, because they are subsidized by taxpayers with free health care, schooling for their children, etc.

.... *.... Or they can outsource their production, firing workers, abandoning plants, and employing slave labor in other countries.

Almost every time we make a purchase, we are forced to contribute either to the abominable system of slavery, or to the magnet that draws the unassimilable tsunami invasion of illegal immigration, all greatly exacerbated by the phenomenon of "Sanctuary Cities," resulting in great loss of the lives of citizens …

… and crowding the schools, the jails, the ERs of hospitals, with added exuberant costs for language interpretation, to the justice, health care, and education, and political systems, etc. increasing unemployment by taking blue-collar jobs from citizens, bankrupting the States, while decreasing their sources of revenue.

They illegally register to vote, and thereby stuff the "ballot box" with illegal votes.



(This, of course, is to say nothing of the massive vote fraud inherent in the use of voting machines, which have replaced the real ballot box. For the People to hold the voting machine programmers accountable is a patent impossibility, which is patently obvious to anyone who gives it any thought.. Why have we allowed this to happen? Is it because we are taught in school that we have the best government in the world; and, believing that, we became too trusting? And what assurance have we that the absentee ballot is secure?)




By now it may be becoming apparent to you that, as well as being the cause of so many ills, illegal immigration is a serious and lethal symptom of the onward rush via FTAA towards surrender of national sovereignty to the NAU, then to its expansion, the American Union (the whole hemisphere), on the way to a one world Marxist government, already in place in embryo in the EU.

The greatest nation on earth,
"the land of the free and the home of the brave,"
is to surrender, without a shot being fired, first to the North American Union, and ultimately to the oppressive Marxist government of the whole world;
where freedom of speech (speaking one's convictions, or just sharing one's faith) has become a "hate crime," for which one can be prosecuted; where acting on one's convictions (like a doctor refusing to perform an abortion) exposes one to prosecution; where it is against the law to say that Jesus is the only way — even, or especially, from the pulpit. Where what should be personal decisions regarding one's health are mandated by the State. In fact, some of these are already happening here now.

By the time the NAU is in place, which is planned to be long before 2012, no one will be giving even lip service to the Constitution. Was Kruschev right when he pounded the desk with his shoe and shouted, "We will bury you."?

One of the means towards this end has been to level the playing field — not by bringing the third world nations up to USA level, but by taking the USA standard of living down to their level. When asked the reason why people in some countries with plentiful natural resources were living in poverty, a man who worked for Winrock (Winthrop Rockefeller) Enterprises, teaching third world people how to improve their way of life, his terse answer was, "government policy." Whereupon he got up and walked away, apparently not wishing to pursue further that conversation.

The only effective way to address the symptoms will be the seemingly impossible task of shutting off the magnet that draws them.





You have seen the bad news
Now see the Good News!

There is hope for restoring government accountability …



The Law of the Land

The general misconception is that any statute — bearing the appearance of law — is the law.

The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land. Any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. … It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law or treaty violating it to be valid; one must prevail. … "No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it."

Sixteenth American Jurisprudence Second Edition, Section 177

The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.

Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it …

A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.


And there is an abundance of case law that says that "the intent of the framers constitutes the law."


This is tremendously good news,
because … it means that to restore government accountability we have essentially to enforce pre-existing constitutional law. We do not have to invent and legislate new laws.

Neither the FTAA, nor the NAU need be repealed. The FTAA was done on "fast track," which has no constitutional authority. The NAU is based on "agreements" among nations, which are, by definition, treaties. Treaties may be made only with advice and consent of the Senate. The Senate has not even been officially notified, much less consulted. FTAA and NAU are both unconstitutional.

The President has no authority or obligation to administer an unconstitutional law or treaty, or spend unconstitutionally appropriated money (like earmarks) …

Yes. the President has both authority and obligation to stop any unconstitutional earmarks, even if his vetoes are overridden. The separation of power, with checks and balances, was built into the framework of the government via the Constitution, in order for each branch of government to be a check on the other two.!



The candidates of the two major parties may or may not know these things, but none of their economic proposals, of higher taxes, lower taxes, flat tax, fair tax, etc.… can possibly cure the economy, because they do not address the underlying causes of its ills: the income tax and the lack of protective tariffs, together rendering industry unable to compete with slave labor overseas; and our debt money system that steals, and has stolen, from us a large share of our wealth, and renders us unable to hold our public servants accountable.

And, by the way, "community organizer" (one of Obama's claimed credentials) is a buzz phrase to identify the people who work toward globalization by organizing communities around common concerns, making treaties in very small increments. The "constitution" of the EU is composed of several thousand incremental treaties, which, taken together capture the sovereignty of the pertinent nations.

And it is known that both candidates are backed by members of the Trilateral Commission, who are implementing a policy of "controlled disintegration." Barry Goldwater alluded to the TC in his 1979 book, "With No Apologies":
"The Trilateral Commission is international and is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power – political, monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical."

You might want to read that last sentence again! What can that mean but that their intent is to take us down the primrose path to globalization with a one-world government? (Do you remember President Bush I promising us a New World Order?)

You can bet that the main change either of the major parties intends to give us is: accelerated advancement into that New World Order (World Government), via the FTAA and the NAU.


You can bet your bottom dollar there will be taxes, about which we will have no say, and no Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights is already being corrupted by all three branches of government to seem to mean much different from what was intended. The US Constitution, to which they have been paying only lip service for the better part of a century, is now being openly and arrogantly ignored (or worse) by G. W. Bush and by Congress, and by the Judiciary. If you have followed the link to the NAU, and read the page, Treason Abounds, you know what G. W. Bush thinks about the Constitution, not only by deed, but also by expletive.

How many of our public officials have even read the Constitution? Apparently in their minds they have sworn an oath to protect nothing but a piece of paper enshrined in a museum. For nearly a century they have pretended that we had a Constitution we could rely on. Now most are no longer even giving it lip service. Since at least 1976, with the exception of Ronald Reagan, our Presidents have been only puppets or figure heads of the shadow government. Earlier, Jack Kennedy made an end run around the Federal Reserve. He also said the office of President was being used, and that before he left office he would tell us about it. (He did not get to do that.)

The NAU will be the crowning blow, which will remove all obstacles to their taking us into the New World Order.

THEY (WHO) SEEK TO ESTABLISH
SYSTEMS OF GOVERNMENT BASED ON
THE REGIMENTATION OF ALL HUMAN
BEINGS BY A HANDFUL OF INDIVIDUAL
RULERS CALL THIS A NEW [WORLD] ORDER
IT IS NOT NEW AND IT IS NOT ORDER






But ... More Good News!

"If, to please the people, we offer what we ourselves disapprove, how can we afterward defend our work? Let us raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair. The event is in the hand of God"
— George Washington, at a critical moment in the Constitutional Convention in 1787

Though you may have never heard of it, as the media is careful not to give it exposure …

The largest third Party in the nation

is committed to curing our economy in the only way possible:
replacing the income tax with a tariff-based revenue, to protect our industry and stop penalizing it, as well as the people; and sealing our borders, which should be first steps in shutting off the magnet that draws illegal immigration. They are committed to restoring government accountability, knowing that as long as we have a debt money system there will be no government accountability.

They have a Constitutional battle plan for restoring the government to accountability. They offer you a viable option to share in restoring government accountability when you vote in November.

You owe it to yourself to check out The Constitution Party. (read especially the Seven Principles of the Constitution Party right there on the home page) and its standard bearer, Chuck Baldwin (He will be a Write-In in some states, including California) To learn about his radio talk show please visit his web site at: www.chuckbaldwinlive.com.

And, for you Ron Paul enthusiasts, Ron Paul has made it clear that he trusts Chuck Baldwin.

Grand Rapids, MI (September 22, 2008) Former GOP presidential candidate, Texas Congressman Ron Paul announced today he is endorsing Constitution Party presidential candidate Chuck Baldwin. (http://www.campaignforliberty.com/blog/?p=582#more-582)

In a letter to supporters, Paul wrote, “I’m supporting Chuck Baldwin, the Constitution Party candidate.”

Paul went on to say, “There is no real choice between the two major parties and their nominees, only the rhetoric varies. The amazingly long campaign is designed to make sure the real issues are ignored.”

With the burgeoning power of the internet to get out the message, a victory for Chuck Baldwin can see … … accountability restored to government.… and the FTAA, illegal immigration, and the NAU, become history!




What you do with this information,
and whether you accept the viable option
that is offered you,
is your call.


The event is in the hand of God.
He can raise up a Gideon with 300 in his army to rout a multitude.

"If when [the watchman] seeth the sword come upon the land, he blow the trumpet, and warn the people; Then whosoever heareth the sound of the trumpet, and taketh not warning; if the sword come, and take him away, his blood shall be upon his own head. He heard the sound of the trumpet, and took not warning; his blood shall be upon him. But he that taketh warning shall deliver his soul.

But if the watchman see the sword come, and blow not the trumpet, and the people be not warned; if the sword come, and take any person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at the watchman's hand. – Ezekiel 33:3-6


This web master is no Ezekiel. But finding myself "on the wall," having spent many years studying history from the perspective of the law — the Constitution — I feel the responsibility to sound the alarm, that you might comprehend what is about to befall our nation, and how there is a straightforward way to defeat it that is possible, while at the same time curing the economy in the only way in which that can be accomplished.

Chuck may be what you would call a long shot, but so was Gideon.



Christians know that the Scriptures foretell the coming of a one world government, headed by the antichrist. They need to consider whether they really want to be counted with those who help to usher it in. They need to consider whether this year a vote for the "lesser of two evils" would be a vote for the antichrist and the New World Order. Is that a way to "occupy 'til He comes?"

Judas fulfilled prophecy. It was not counted to him as righteousness.

In any case, for Christian and non-Christian alike ...

The stakes are high in this election


Once it is no longer even being paid lip service by any public servants, the Constitution will be gone. There will be no way to get it back, short of revolution. Now do you see the real reason why they want to take away our guns?

"They" intend for the NAU to be in operation within two years! They have been "harmonizing our laws" with Mexico and Canada since 2005.

What? the Congress?

No! the President! — to whom the Constitution gives no authority to legislate (make law)! And he has been making treaties with neither advice nor consent of the Senate, which are the constitutional restrictions upon his treaty making powers! King George blatantly thumbs his nose at the Constitution.





NOTE: All of the links above (there are not many) are essential background information to be able fully to comprehend WHY restoring government accountability is VITAL to the survival of the USA, the seriousness of our situation, and why you have nothing to lose by voting for Baldwin. He is the only one running for President who knows the law; and he knows how to restore accountability BY law. If the others knew or respected the law, they would not be promoting the law-breaking of illegal immigration, and allowing free reign on our highways to Mexican trucks, without the inspection that ours are required to undergo, etc., etc., etc.

Before you leave this page, if you have not followed those links, do yourself the favor of going back and following each and every one of them, even if you think you know all about that subject. You may be surprised by how much you do not know. Then, when you have followed all the links in the main body of the discussion, you might want to go back to the top and follow those that will help you get better acquainted with the Constitution.

Again, what you do with this information, and whether you accept the viable option that is offered you, is your call. I hope I have done my part well. The event is in the hand of God.



§ § § § § § § § §









FTAA: What Is It?
How Will It Affect You?

Scheduled to Be in Operation by January 1, 2005
Why Is It Never Mentioned by the Media?

What investigative reporter Joan Veon discovered will soon be a "done deal" unless it is stopped, and we restore government accountability. Discover how the FTAA will impact your life.






Bankruptcies Greatly Increased
Who Are Declaring Bankruptcy?
and Why?

If you think you are immune, you might need to think again. Is this another instance of a need to restore government accountability?

Read about what Professor Warren and her daughter discovered, and what that means to you.







If We Don't Pay Attention to History
We Are Bound to Repeat It


.. a long habit of not thinking a thing wrong,
gives it a superficial appearance of being right,
and raises at first
a formidable outcry in defense of custom.
-- Thomas Paine in his preface to Common Sense









WebMaster: Jean Westphal
who spent years studying and researching law and history
from the perspective of the Constitution
This web site built and managed by Jean with SBI!

To send comments, suggestions, or requests for links:
Please click here.
Please put "RGA" on the subject line.



FTAA: Its Impact
FTAA will supercede our U.S. Constitution and radically alter our standard of living in the name of "free trade." How has anything so momentous been withheld from the public forum?

What? No Oil?
No oil?: Soon the available oil will begin to deplete. What would life be like without oil? Can alternative energy sources meet our demand? How can we prepare to adapt to changing circumstances?

Bankruptcies: Who? Why So Many?
Bankruptcies, greatly increased in the last decade, are now accelerating: Who are they? Why so many?

Restoring Accountability in New Zealand: the Amazing Results
Restoring accountability in New Zealand, they have eliminated waste, decreased taxes, increased employment, decreased numbers on welfare, and improved education while decreasing cost.

Focus on Congress: What Happens on that First Plane Ride to Washington?
Focus on Congress: What Happens on That First Plane Ride to Washington? Actually it starts happening even before they get on the plane.

Banking Fraud Exposed
Banking fraud is exposed with humor and a revolutionary proposal. At a billion dollars per day, are we funding the demise of our nation? What did John Maynard Keynes say about inflation?

Greenspan on Gold and Economic Freedom
Greenspan on Gold: "Deficit spending is simply a scheme for the "hidden" confiscation of wealth. Gold stands in the way of this insidious process."

The Treaty Supremacy Loophole
Treaty Supremacy: Is it really a loophole in the Constitution by which President and Senate can do anything if they can get a foreign power to agree? What does the Constitution really say?

Judicial Tyranny was Foreseen by Thomas Jefferson
Judicial tyranny: What Jefferson foresaw -- judicial usurpation of constitutional powers of People and of Congress -- so alarmed him that to its prevention he devoted much of his life.

Reconstructing the Republic: A Constitutional Battle Plan
Reconstructing the Republic -- Howard Phillips clearly outlines the constitutional way back to sanity and government accountability

Restoring the Dollar -- Address by Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr.
Restoring the Dollar -- People don't even know the name or source of what they use as money, let alone what its problems are, or what to do about it.

Declaration of Independence
Declaration of Independence: From what "long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object..." did we declare our independence?

The price paid by the signers of the Declaration of Independence
The price paid by those who signed; they pledged their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor. What kind of men were they? And what hardships did they endure?

Constitutional Power Grants are Few and Explicit
Constitutional power grants to the federal government are few and explicit; all the rest of the Constitution represents constraints on that power for our protection.

U S Constitution
The U S Constitution -- based on biblical principles -- is a blueprint for the nation of a prosperous and free people